Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Filmklip og arbejdsspørgsmål vedr. livsværdier

Måske kan de filmklip, vi skal arbejde med i Barcelona inspirere andre. Her følger mine udvalgte klip med arbejdsspørgsmål - på engelsk:


The Shawshank Redemption:
-          arrival
-          music – freedom of spirit – explanation after black hole-experience

Questions for group-debate:
o        What is a prison – physically, mentally and symbolical ?
o        How does the symbols in the film (prison, guns, hole, the mob, guards, Inspector referring to God and the Bible, cells, books, music) refer to existential circumstances in human life ?
o        How do we imprison others and ourselves ? – give examples and evaluate them.
o        How can we liberate others and ourselves ?

Lars and the Real Girl:
-          inclusion
-          accept
-          tolerance

Questions for group-debate:
o        How does Lars’ brother and wife and the physiatrist  react to Bianca and Lars alternative behaviour ?
o        What would you consider a human response to the different situations we have seen ?
o        What are the values behind your considerations ?

The Fisher King:

-          Jack JD: consume-relation, irresponsibility

Questions for group-debate:
o        How would you characterize Jacks behaviour ?
o        What values lies behind Jacks behaviour ?
o        If you where Jack in the scene, how would you have behaved differently ? and why ?

-          Parry makes chair for Lydia

Questions for group-debate:
o        Which values does Parry express with his act and words in the scene ?
o        -              -           -        Lydia   -              -        -     -     -       -            -   -     -          ?
o        How does the scene affect you existentially and ethically ?

-          Grand Central Station

Questions for group-debate:
o        Which fundamental ground-value is the scene based on ?
o        What is the symbolic meaning of the scene from your perspective ?

Lord of the Rings:
-          meeting: divine power => demonizing, divisions and separation
-          sacrifice
-           
Questions for group-debate:
o        how does the different parties at the meeting address the challenge of the Ring ?
o        what is the symbolic and existential meaning behind the after-meeting between Frodo and Bilbo ?

Dead Man Walking:

-          inclusion – priest and sister Helen,
-          responsibility – guilt – human dignity
-          son of God
-           forgiveness, community and cohesion

Questions for group-debate:
o        How would you characterize the two positions taken by the priest and sister Helen in the first scene ?
o        Why is it important for sister Helen to make Matthew realise and admit his responsibility and guilt ?
o        On what basis does sister Helen make it possible for Matthew to confess ?
o        How is Matthew re-included in a human community and cohesion again ?

Once were Warriors:
-          language and bridging

Questions for group-debate:
o        how would you characterize the words used and overall the communication between the man and woman in the scene shown ?
o        which role does the ability of speak and communication play in interrelations ?
o        how can words respectively be edify or decompose in a human relationship ?
o        what examples from your own experience can you give on both edifying and decomposing situations ?

Bagdad café:

-          piano and the melody of life

Questions for group-debate:
-          what in Frau Ms behaviour opens the boy and makes him find the Melody ?
-          find situations where you hold some of your fellowman’s life and happiness in your hand and discuss how to behave properly according to your values ?

-          vacuuming-meeting

Questions for group-debate:
-          how does Frau Münchstettner act to open and include the distant girl ?
-          what act-options would you try in a similar situation ?

Djævelens advokat:
-          responsibility, guild, freedom, egoism, sacrifice, temptation

Questions for group-debate:
o        what is there to criticize on Kevin’s behaviour in his advocate-practise and his life-practise ? Why ?
o        how/with what means does Kevin’s father / The Devil tempt him ?

No comments: